
Nice wee unsettling FrightFest short about getting an eye exam. All that darkness, and breath on your face, and taking away your ability to see clearly makes for fertile ground for the shivers. What’s that out the corner of your eye!

Nice wee unsettling FrightFest short about getting an eye exam. All that darkness, and breath on your face, and taking away your ability to see clearly makes for fertile ground for the shivers. What’s that out the corner of your eye!

Cowboys is about Joe riding off into the Montana wilderness with his dad to escape his transphobic mother who is determined to raise Joe as a girl. Steve Zahn radiates warmth as the kind of dad we all want, a man who has his kid’s back. Sasha Knight is excellent as Joe, giving a mature and nuanced performance beyond his years. Anne Dowd is, as always, a consummate gem as the empathetic cop on their trail, just wanting to see everyone safe and sound without taking one side or another. And Jillian Bell plays the self-involved mother who can’t see her kid for the the daughter that she wanted to dress up like a doll in matching outfits.
It’s hard because obviously the mother is the least sympathetic of the bunch. She seems jealous of her husband’s love for his kid, and resentful of their child’s draw on his attention. She turns every conversation back to being about her, and makes out that even Joe being trans is somehow a spiteful rejection, as if he has rejected her motherly bond down even to rejecting her gender.
But she is not simply vilified. She talks about how her husband gets to be ‘the cool dad’ while she has to be the disciplinarian, she has to raise their kid, and keep house, and bring in money, and pay bills, and be the miserable, responsible one. “Who would chose to be a girl?” she asks. No one would volunteer to take the second-class option out of the choice of genders. Which, yeah, has its own logic to it. Except women who reject their second-class status have for generations become feminists, and the only people who transition are trans men.
I know I criticise a lot of movies for making being trans the central problem of the story, but Cowboys very much feels like transphobia is the central problem of the story. Joe’s mum, not Joe, is the one with the problem, she is the cause of the issue that sparks the journey and sets off the tale. It’s not really Joe’s arc that is the resolution of the film, it is his mother’s experience of being without her child that makes her realise just how lucky she was to have Joe, and to let go of the things that were driving him away. Nothing is mentioned about Joe’s transition medically or bodily. It is utterly irrelevant to the point. This film is about accepting the people we love for who they are.

A black-and-white noir crime thriller, in the mould of old spy flicks or movies about socialites and cat burglars. Intrigue and tension abound in this tight, one room clue-cracker. The film is almost entirely silent, with minimal sparse dialogue and a little back and forth over text. The film is entirely carried on the performance of the central character played by Paul Bruchon, the only person we see in the film beyond their shoes or a silhouette. His frantic reaction to being trapped in this situation, followed by waves of relief as he starts to unpick the mystery is all communicated through his expression and physicality.
An unseen woman anonymously hires a burglar to retrieve an item from the house of wealthy man. However, before the burglar is able to make his escape, an entire party’s worth of people arrive at the house, and he is trapped in the back study where everyone has thrown their coats. Using only what is in the room, he must find out why what he’s taken is so valuable, who it is he’s taken it from, and what the stakes are in this game of cat and mouse. This all the while people come and go from the room, and he may be discovered at any moment!
Apart from the obvious film influences like Hitchcock, I was weirdly reminded of the puzzle mobile games. You know, stuff like The Room, where you have to click on everything to figure out how you can use it to unlock the door, or detective games like Innocent, where you get clues piecemeal from unknown and not entirely trustworthy sources and you have to solve the crime.
The Woman With Leopard Shoes proves you don’t need a big budget, an expansive cast, or even a massive set to make a film. Alexis Bruchon has basically made as tense and gripping a film as any Hollywood thriller, and he’s done it with a room, maybe 3 actors total, and some black-and-white film.

A seventeen year old girl loses her mum in a car crash and is sent to live with her aunt’s family, a bunch of gangsters. The main character Ida has to decide whether she will chose her newfound family over the right and wrongs of their nefarious dealings.
You get the feeling that Ida’s previous life was one of loneliness, that her mother was an addict and there was a lot of neglect. Her aunt’s house is full of kisses and cuddles, and chit-chat and banter, and everyone round the table for breakfast. Whatever the criminal aspects, it’s more wholesome than she’s ever had before. You can tell she really craves that mother-daughter bond. But how far will she go to belong?

Thoroughly enjoyable possession movie. Cristina is a journalist and junkie who ventures back to her birthplace in Mexico for an ethnographic article. Having largely lost touch with her roots after her adoption and move to the US at a young age, she no longer speaks Spanish and has no belief in the religious and traditional myths and practices. So she takes no heed of warnings not to go into a cursed cave.
Cue possession and attempts at exorcism. I like that Cristina acts like she’s seen a horror movie before and reacts with some degree of practicality. She states clearly that a lot of the ‘signs’ of her possession could easily be manufactured by her so-called benevolent healers and that her food could be being drugged to make her see things. What she alone knows is that she still has heroin in her system, and as it starts to wear off, that could be causing vomiting and muscle spasms. So there is a credible ambiguity at play.
While the addiction as possession trope is a fairly worn one, and the film relies mostly on jump-scares, nonetheless The Old Ways is well put together, decently acted, and has interesting costume and set design. A totally solid movie for a Friday night.

In 1963 the Gagarine housing estate was opened in Ivry, France. Named after the Russian cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin, the first man in space, who attended its opening. It was a building of the future, in an era of optimism where the possibilities seemed endless.
Now in the 21st century, the estate has been subject to deliberate underfunding and decline, and is slated for demolition. It is seen as out-dated, no longer meeting the needs of its inhabitants. Its modernist-brutalist architecture has fallen out of vogue, and would be considered an eyesore by today’s standards. The future it was built for has become a place of impoverishment, gentrification, displacement and disillusionment. It is a place of unfulfilled promises.
But not for Yuri, the main character in the film Gagarine. Named after Yuri Gagarin, just like his home, he is a believer. He tries against the odds to keep his community going, carrying out building repairs with his sharp engineering mind, hard work and creativity. He does everything he can to help and improve the lives of people there.
You see Gagarine through Yuri’s eyes, not as an ugly old high-rise, but as a world of intricate design, fascinating structure, and imbued with the warmth of the people it carries. The cinematography in this is just gorgeous, evoking through the architecture of this building the science fiction of the 60s. The lines of doors along the neon lit corridors are transformed into a sight as awesome as the interior of the spaceship, lined with hatches, in 2001: A Space Odyssey. Everything is made new and fresh in Yuri’s eyes. Everything seems taken for granted as a commonplace miracle. His is a world full of wonder.
And that’s the word I’d use to characterise this film – wonder. If you want to see something that will make you come alive again to the awes all around you, the night sky, the interlocking homes of a neighbourhood, the tenderness of hopeful imagination, this is the film to see.

Okay. So… Welcome II The Terrordome is the first ever feature film to get a theatrical release that was made by a Black British woman, and would remain so for nearly a decade, so its existence at all is an achievement. That being said it was clearly made on a budget of £3.50 and hasn’t aged well in a lot of regards. So I would come to this with an interest in it as a piece of cinematic history rather than an expectation of something slick.
It is set in a dystopian future, in a massive ghetto whose inhabitants refer to it as the Terrordome. It is 1995’s idea of a bleak future, so everything looks like 1995 but shoddy. It’s a future setting, but not overtly futuristic, if you know what I mean. The same problems as always exist and have just become more entrenched, racism, poverty, police brutality and the scourge of drugs and gangs.
One family struggles to survive. The granny trying to hold it all together is Rosa Parkson (did I mention that one of the film’s problems is that it’s heavy handed?) Her daughter Anjela McBride is trying to raise her kids right, and not take after their gangster father Rad. Anjela’s brother Spike however, works for Rad selling drugs, and Anjela’s sister Christele is hooked on them. There’s tension in the family because Spike has got himself a white girlfriend, Jodie, and everyone is sure this will result in disaster. Spike doesn’t care, he and Jodie are in love and she is carrying his child.
The first half of the film establishing all of this is … not great. The dialogue is cringy, and a lot has to be explained through narration. But because it’s the 90s, there’s a lot of rap narration. You can kinda see the ambition the director has for the film, but it’s overleaping the ability to produce it.
The second half of the film begins when Jodie’s ex-boyfriend Jason catches up to her. He and his cronies want to make her pay for leaving him for a black man, and in a truly brutal scene, even for its low-budget limitations, he beats her until she miscarries, then forces her to eat her womb’s blood. Unbeknownst to Jodie, Anjela’s son has snuck out of the house and has witnessed all of this. Jason and his pals chase the boy until he falls off the building. Both Anjela and Jodie lose their kids on the same night.
It’s here the film starts to pick up, as Anjela, upon discovering the body of her son, goes on a killing rampage, getting her revenge on Jason and his crew, but also the cops. Again, as a piece of cinematic history, Welcome II The Terrordome is unique for being a 90s movie with a cop-killing spree that is portrayed as both sympathetic and justified. And while there are plenty of films of white men cracking in murderous frustration, like 1993’s Falling Down, I can’t think of any where a black woman is the central figure.
Rad makes peace with the rival gang to take a united stand against the forces of oppression in the Terrordome, leading to violent riots. Unlike the frantic lawlessness that race riots are dominantly portrayed as in the media, this is shown as collective black resistance towards the systems of white supremacy and oppression, both just and righteous, and necessary for their dignity as an insistence of their own worth as human beings.
What I quite liked is that Jodie is not treated as “the good white person”. As granny Rosa says, “Are we suppose to be grateful? Are we suppose to raise up our hands and say, “Thank you missy! Thank you very much for getting your hands dirty!”?” She is given no more sympathy than anyone else for suffering in this ghetto just because she is white. She is widely viewed as a liability, and blamed as the sparking cause for Anjela’s demise. Despite how she is spoken about by the characters though, the director does soften than somewhat, showing Jodie placing her stillborn fetus on the chalk outline of Anjela’s son, just another mother of a black child taken from the world by racism and indifference to black life.
The story is bookended by the portrayal of the Ibo Landing resistance, in which transported Africans refused to submit to slavery on the American shore and chose to walk into the sea en masse. This collective suicide was seen as the only act of defiance open to them, but also has been wove into legend that they attempted to swim back to Africa, either way taking their fate in their own hands. The same actors playing the main cast play the shackled Ibo.
At the end, as the Terrordome burns, and Anjela is led in chains to be hanged for her crimes, the Ibo are seen emerging from the water on the opposite shore, breaking their chains, finally free.
It’s a film with a lot of interesting ideas, and I would say the ending really works. It is obviously being looked at again now, now that we have reached that future seen from the 90s, and it is a lot closer to Welcome II The Terrordome than a raceless and moneyless utopia like Star Trek: Next Generation. Our issues did get more entrenched, more brutal. And the message of uncompromising defiance rings as more necessary than ever, even unto bloodshed. The rage at widespread injustice must be acknowledged and felt by all. For all its faults on a technical level, Welcome II The Terrordome tries to say something that people even 25 years on are not willing to hear.

Fascinating documentary about the Abrew family, recounting their history in the early 20th century. There’s Lottie Abrew, a dancer, contortionist, stage performer, and activist. Her brother Charlie is a boxer and war veteran. Her other brother Manuel was also a boxer, beating Benny Lynch 3 times but forbidden from competing for the title because he was black.
It’s strange because usually a career in showbiz or sport is coveted because of its celebrity, but as different family members point out, it was really the only sector in which Black Brits could get work, and their ambitions in much more mundane professions were frequently thwarted by racism. Accordingly, Manuel’s wife Clementina Abrew is very proud that she manages to make it as a dressmaker. This despite the fact that Clementina acted in small roles in films, sometimes alongside her husband, like in The Proud Valley starring Paul Robeson. You would think meeting and working with a big Hollywood star would be your goal, but to her, the fact she is able to make her living in an ordinary job is what gives her a great sense of achievement.
This is a repeating theme throughout the family’s stories, that work could be found playing “the exotic”, but it was much harder just to be accepted as an everyday person. In that way the contribution and history of Black Scots is erased, because they are always seen as coming from ‘away’, or seen to be exceptional. Playing an African village native in a movie fits in with the British idea of black people far more than being a dressmaker or engineer whose family has been here for generations.
Still, the story of the Abrews is one to be celebrated, tracing their tenacity and resourcefulness. It is also fascinating to hear about black community life in the inter-war era, a subject that is not given much attention. Really great that this oral history was captured.

Excellent and powerful short about a toilet attendant who is pressured into manipulating women for the amusement of men behind the bathroom’s two-way mirror.
No doubt inspired by local scumbag Stephan King’s two-way bathroom mirror in the Shimmy Club, where women and girls were unknowingly displayed to paying men, something I still can’t believe wasn’t illegal. The Glasgow nightclub in Expensive Shit shows Tolu, vulnerable to the pressures of her employer as an undocumented worker, as she struggles to find any way out of complying with the demand that she persuade a club regular to drink from a water bottle likely spiked with a date rape drug.
In only 15 minutes, the film says so much about power dynamics, across gender, race, and migrant status. You never feel like you are being talked at. Everything that happens in the film is something that happens in life, just brought to one place. A film really evocative of the true cost of the male gaze.

A pretentious arsehole actor meets a woman on a bridge with actual real problems.
The film starts with Jihoon’s long-suffering girlfriend dumping him, like the woman of sense she is. After a decade in a relationship together, he has no intention of marrying her, or concern about contributing financially. He is an act-tor don’t you know, and the fact he is not supporting himself by acting or any other work seems to bother him not a jot. Now they’ve passed 30, she wants to get her life started, and maybe one day provide for her family. This confirms Jihoon’s opinion of himself as the only true artist.
With no girlfriend to presumably leach off of, he takes a job patrolling the bridges over the Han River in the centre of Seoul, a big spot for suicides. The purpose is to approach anyone standing on their own who looks like they are considering jumping, and kind of just giving them a bit of company and chit chat to deflect the impulse in the moment. They send this self-involved cretin with low emotional intelligence off to do this highly sensitive job after a quick Powerpoint presentation.
On his first night, he meets Eunyeung, a woman who had a relationship with a coworker which turned violent and ended with his arrest, and is now being pressured to leave her job because she is a headache for HR. There’s a business with no gender-based violence policy.
Jihoon finds her ready to jump on the bridge and chats to her, telling her he’s there to jump too, but maybe it might do them good to go for a walk for a little while. He encourages her to talk, telling her all about his problems as an out-of-work actor, unappreciated by those around him *eyeroll*. He then comes up with the great idea of roleplay, and makes her act out a scene with him in which he gets to exercise his acting chops by playing an abusive partner. He is excited at the challenge of performing one of the most traumatic moments in her life. He comforts her by telling her knows what she’s going through, because being mistreated by the person you love and trust most, then stigmatised and blamed for it publicly, that’s a lot like him not getting a lot of acting parts.
Ugh. This guy.
This film is shot mostly in black-and-white, is only an hour and a quarter long and yet the film title doesn’t show until 25 minutes into the movie. That’s all you need to know.
Jihoon does go on a bit of a character arc. Arc might be overstating it a bit, maybe something smaller, like an arcmin. Anyway, he does have a moment of self-reflection, for what seems like the first time in his life. Turns out dealing with suicide has emotional repercussions, and he seems to actually consider the topic for the first time. Which, I dunno man, I just have limited sympathy for. Maybe it’s living here, in the suicide capital of Scotland, but how can you only be noticing something like that in your 30s? They say in the movie that somebody’s going off these bridges almost every day, how can you be so blind to that?
Anyway, I’m sure he’ll use it for tools in his acting paintbox. After all, most things in this movie funnel back to being about him.