
Going into Foragers, the opening film of the Take One Action Film Festival here in Glasgow, and got given a lovely piece of Palestinian flatbread. So delicious I took a bite out of it before I even took the picture. Om nom nom nom nom!

Going into Foragers, the opening film of the Take One Action Film Festival here in Glasgow, and got given a lovely piece of Palestinian flatbread. So delicious I took a bite out of it before I even took the picture. Om nom nom nom nom!

I’d never seen Moulin Rouge! before. When the trailer came out, back in the day, I just thought, ach, I don’t fancy that. However, in the intervening years this has now meant 1 demerit point on my queer card, so when the GYFF had it as its closing film, I thought I’d rectify that.
The start was everything I thought it might be, full of slo mo and the ghost-train judder shots Baz Luhrmann loves so well. Songs playing over each other simultaneously, everything loud, everything bright, everything extra as fuck. I kept thinking about John Waters, and a quote I could only half remember, “If less is more, think how much more more would be”. Frenetic, tacky, cacophonous, it was exactly the Moulin Rouge! I expected. My granny watched it on TV once back in the 2000s and pronounced, “Whaever made that Moulin Rouge must be oan that co-caine”. My gran was right on the money.
However, once the film calms its tits, and we drift into the second act, I found myself slowly warming to it. Ewan McGregor’s naive young lover is disarmingly endearing, and Nicole Kidman plays the woman marked for doomed love with a mix of cool, sleek chic and nervous heartfluttering. I of course never sympathise with the right people, and just felt sorry for the Duke, who tries to make all Satine’s (Kidman) dreams come true, only to find out she’s making a fool out of him in front of the whole company, just to milk him dry. As the love triangle ramped up, I found myself thinking, well, it’s no my cup of tea, but it’s no bad.
Finally the melodrama reached its long-telegraphed crescendo, and the audience around me descended into sniffles, sighs and sobbing. And you know, as overwrought as the whole thing was, McGregor and Kidman just save it with excellent performances, they just commit despite the ludicrousness of everything around them. And I have to say I could sit through it again, I actually enjoyed myself.
The big thing that no one talks about is race in Moulin Rouge. The almost entirely white cast perform a play about an Indian courtesan and maharaja in stage brown-face, while the only Black cast member is named Chocolate. Yikes.
The other thing, more a plot hole, is if you find out someone has TB, you definitely do tell them, so they can make the decision about whether to continue swapping spit with the person they love. Plus, she’s huffing and puffing and belting out all these song numbers all over the top of the rest of the company, and you don’t think *maybe* it might be a better idea to tell her to no do that coz she’s got a highly contagious, fatal disease?
Outside of those, Moulin Rouge! is just a great big sing-along, bombastic, gaudy, and operatically over-the-top. And that enthusiasm is so infectious, it eventually just took me with it.

To see us out, the GYFF closed with Moulin Rouge, and to get us ready for the film, a trio of can-can dancers put on a performance. They came down the aisles handing out flowers and I got this bad boy, before kicking their legs in the air. GYFF and the GFT really know how to make a night of it

Wiping away tears of laughter. It would be really hard to write something as naturally funny as the folk in this film manage to be.
A Bunch Of Amateurs is a documentary about Bradford Movie Makers, an amateur filmmaking club that has lasted nearly a century. It has a vibrant cast of characters, each with their own passion and enthusiasm for cinema. Despite dwindling cash and an aging membership, it provides a community and creative space for people with a love of film.
The humour comes from the co-existence of the aspiration and fantasy of cinema with the relentlessly mundane concerns of the real world, this dry, deadpan, Northern, working class practicality banging up against imaginative endeavours. Harry wants to recreate the opening song from Oklahoma! Phil asks, “Where we gonna get a field where the corn is as high as an elephant’s eye? Nothing like that round here.” “No,” replies Harry, matter-of-fact, “Not in Bradford.”
The warmth though is what really makes the film. This is a group of people who have been meeting weekly for years, decades in some cases. They’ve built friendships, brought along their spouses, and become a family. Despite the ups and downs of creative differences and the limitations in budget, they are there for one another. Colin is adjusting to life at home now his beloved wife has moved to a dementia care facility, but going to the film club provides continuity, routine, engagement, and joy. When a fall prevents him from making it to a meeting, they come to him, putting up a projector screen in his livingroom.
The laughter the film brings out is the laughter of family, of indulging foibles, of not taking things too seriously when they are meant to be a bit of fun, of fostering each other’s dreams, even when they are decidedly impractical. I loved Colin’s habit of just deciding to do club house improvements at random moments, like sawing through wood partitions in the back kitchen while everyone’s watching Harry’s clip from Oklahoma!, or deciding to paint over graffiti on the side of the building in the drizzling rain. I loved Harry insisting on recreating the scene from Oklahoma! despite refusing to ride an actual horse. I loved watching Phil just stress-drink hunners of cups of tea, as he figures out how to make these ideas a reality.
It’s also great that the documentary gives a representation of 80-year-olds and 90-year-olds you don’t usually see on screen, namely at play. Depictions of that age group can be so unrelentingly grim, focusing solely on being confined to the body as it weakens. It’s good to see a reminder that even when older, we are still a world of imagination, storytelling, silliness, and whimsy. All of us, even in our longer years, are partly magic.
Just a great film, highly recommend you see it. A great laugh, very touching in places, about this little corner of the world where people are keeping their dreams alive. Goan yersel!

Going into seeing Corpse Bride, I remembered watching it at the pictures back in the 2000s and coming away rather underwhelmed. I remember thinking that the music felt very phoned-in. As I went for a rewatch in 2022, I struggled to remember if there were actual songs in it.
Trouble is, Corpse Bride was the first time the team of The Nightmare Before Christmas had reunited for an animated film and a lot of the marketing had been hyping that up. A decade of fans/wee goths had been raised on the Christmas/Halloween classic and were ready to devour more in that vein, myself included. I remember being disappointed in Corpse Bride, but now twenty years on, I wondered if it wasn’t maybe just its inability to live up to the hype.
And well . . . no, it’s not. Corpse Bride doesn’t work. And on rewatch it’s clear there are a number of reasons why.
First the music and songs are very forgettable. Name me one song from Corpse Bride? See, you can’t. Also the sound levels are all over the place, with dialogue descending to a whisper, then background music crashing in in a cacophony. The whole audioscape of the film needs another going over. Frequently in songs people are speak-singing, rather than actually singing, so a chorus sounds like the garble of a rabble, all lyrics indistinct and lost. This is a problem for the film overall, as the Corpse Bride’s backstory is told entirely in song, so if you don’t follow, you’re missing a chunk of characterisation, as well as (spoilers) the whole crux of the finale.
Secondly, in a musical, which this is, you usually open with one of two things, an “I want” song or “We are” song, establishing the world or your main character, both of which kick off the plot. Your world has a central premise which provides a challenge, or your character’s desires precipitate a journey. Corpse Bride opens with Victor and Victoria’s parents singing about how they want a perfect wedding to help them trade their status for wealth and vice versa. Like, it’s the least give-a-fuck-able aspect of the whole story. It doesn’t tell us anything about our main character, Victor. It doesn’t set up a world in which the creepy possibility of marrying a corpse might be possible. Imagine if the opening had been a spooky retelling of the legend of the Corpse Bride, her elopement, vanishing and suspected murder. That would have established your title character way before she is actually (rather belatedly) introduced in the film. And the foreshadowing would set some stakes before we’ve been bored to death by a dreary wedding rehearsal.
Victor at no point sings an “I want” song. He is a non-entity of a character. Meant to be a charming, bumbling, slightly sensitive, English, young man, he has no real personality beyond that. He seems reticent but resigned to being married, slightly encouraged when he meets Victoria for 5 seconds, which in the language of movies now means they’re in love, but willing to ditch her at the first sign of obstacle and kill himself to be with the Corpse Bride. Throughout this, he doesn’t really have highs and lows, he doesn’t fall down, despair and dig deep, he doesn’t learn a lesson. He’s a passenger throughout the entire film.
Far more interesting, both visually and in characterisation is the Corpse Bride. Both the animation and Helena Bonham Carter’s performance make her a much more dynamic and engaging person, with an interesting backstory and clear motivation. She has a clear “I want” number, eager to fulfil her thwarted dream of marriage. And she has enough screen-time to actually establish a rapport with Victor, enough that they could genuinely seem to have chemistry. And Victor seems willing to die to be with her, which would indicate a stronger feeling towards her than Victoria, who he has a simpering, pallid, awkward interaction with over a piano once.
And that’s the other thing about this film, it’s all over the place. Victor ends up with Victoria, not the Corpse Bride, in an ending so wrong it’s up there with Pretty In Pink (I’m with you Duckie, never forget). Like, the most he has in common with Victoria is their names. They have two scenes together, neither of which go beyond awkward politeness. While there is a gaping chasm where Victor’s character should be, the Corpse Bride at least seems to sweep him up in her own highs and lows. Instead of the romance culminating in a Romeo-style self-sacrifice to be with a woman he has some desire to be with, and resolve her sad tale with a happy ending, he ends up with the lassie that will make is his status-obsessed parents happy. What kind of ending is that?
It’s not just the ending I have a problem with, the whole movie is baggy. This isn’t something you see a lot in animation, because it is so fucking expensive and time intensive to make, it’s usually been storyboarded to within an inch of its life. Unlike live action, you can’t just do a rewrite and pull some reshoots. Scenes take months and years to make. So with this, you would think that the film would be tight, just scene-scene-scene, bang-bang-bang. But you find yourself watching scenes thinking, what is this for? It feels wooly and airy, with a lack of focus. Whose emotional through-line are we meant to be following? It’s only an hour and 10 minutes, but it feels long.
So in conclusion, it’s not just a matter of not living up to hype. Corpse Bride fails on its own demerits. Which is sad because there was a nugget of a cool idea there, and all the talent present to make it work. It just doesn’t.

GYFF showing Napoleon Dynamite was just the excuse I needed for a rewatch. It wasn’t until it started that I realised, shit I must not have seen this since I first watched it, back in the mid-2000s. I hoped it was as good as I remembered. My trepidation was at least partially founded on the fact the film spawned a boom in loser rom-coms, which leaned progressively more into nerd toxicity, the manic pixie dream girl trope, and geek misogyny – I’m looking at you Scott Pilgrim.
I needn’t worry, Napoleon Dynamite remains a superb piece of comedy. Its straight delivery with Napoleon’s flat, deadpan voice, only raising to whine or sulk – “God!” – is just perfection. The weirdness of the town, the rural backwater where everything is still trying to catch up from 20 years ago, being broke and dressing out of second hand shops so all your clothes are from the 80s. I loved Kip, his soft-spoken effeminate voice as he talks about “chatting with babes online” in what you are sure must be a catfish. With it being so quotable, I forgot just how much of what’s hilarious about the film is the physical comedy, Napoleon running headfirst out of shots, flinging a spatula of leftovers at Tina the llama, Pedro doing some deeply unimpressive “sweet jumps” on his bike.
As I say, later iterations on this kind of style of film became less pleasant, but Napoleon Dynamite is still good clean fun. Deb’s role isn’t to save or redeem or make whole Napoleon. She’s just his friend, even if there is the tingle of something more between them. The film doesn’t end on a kiss but on the two of them playing tetherball. This is a film in which friendship is the goal, the glue that holds everyone together. At the start Napoleon is a complete loner, but by the end, he’s built a little tribe. The sweetness is the sincerity of that, even amongst the lunacy of everything else.
Still a great film.

Fourth wall-breaking, meta whodunnit. Thoroughly enjoyable.
An extra game to play throughout the film, if you’re a loser like me, is spotting actors who have been in Agatha Christie adaptations, and trying to remember from which story and which character they were.
Last minute Lucian Msamati was also a delightful treat.

Duthchas is a beautiful film about life on the island of Berneray, combining a family archive of film shot in the 1960s with interviews with residents and their descendants. The title Duthchas is a word roughly translated here into Home, but has no direct translation in English, encompassing a wealth of ideas, including heritage, lineage, culture, and relationship with the world and each other.
My first thought when watching this film was about how different life is. Even when comparing the apples and oranges of the past and the present, I couldn’t help feeling that, despite being Scottish, my life has more in common with an English-speaking city dweller in another country than it has with a Gaelic-speaking Hebridean. Gloria, an Australian nurse who was the first non-Gaelic speaker to settle on the island, and whose wedding is captured on film, describes Berneray as so “foreign”, and I understood what she meant.
Language is a huge part of it, and you can trace the generational shifts in the loss of it. The older generation, who you can see as young men and women in the film, are native Gaelic speakers, and during their adolescence Gaelic was the only language spoken on the island. English was reserved for use on the mainland, and women who went rarely outside the islands would maybe not speak it at all. Language is such a cornerstone of culture, conveying a worldview, values, and intrinsic ideas. It is not simply different sounds for like-for-like subjects, it is a transmission of whole communal understanding of the world and ourselves.
In the 1960s, life on Berneray was one of tight knit community, with daily interaction and reliance on one another, for crofting, for fishing, for trading. In the evening was ceilidhing, going to the neighbours’ house for drinking and dancing. Churchgoing on the Sunday was an unspoken must, as was the rule that you never put your washing out on the Sabbath. People lived in the houses their grandfathers and great-grandfathers built. They could trace their lineage back through their patronymic, pass down tales and songs that existed for hundreds of years.
The interruption in that way of life was when time for secondary school came, and children were sent off the island to residential schools taught entirely in English. And if you couldn’t speak English, you were given the belt until you could. It was a brutal dislocation, and it beat Gaelic out an entire generation. Women especially, were not expected to return to the island, as all paying work there was seen as ‘for men’. Mothers are the best resource you can have for handing down knowledge and culture, and without a place for them on the island, young women married on the mainland or emigrated abroad, taking the next generation of family with them.
Television also ended the nightly ceilidhs, and made the intergenerational social cohesion decline. People became isolated in their own homes, creating gaps among the older Gaelic-speaking populace and the younger English-speaking families. Ceilidhs were not simply about dancing, but where language, music, song, history and story were handed down. Younger people just weren’t exposed to this.
But while this is a reminiscence, it isn’t a eulogy. A new generation is coming up, who have had the opportunity of being educated in Gaelic medium schools, and who have Gaelic and are keen to keep it. It may not be the Gaelic of their forefathers, but its very survival leaves open the door for all that to be preserved and rediscovered. The causeway has meant greater ease of travel and better economic prospects. And technology has meant that working on the mainland isn’t the absolute necessity it once was.
Duthchas charts the change and continuity of a way of life, of a home that has been kept by its people even when separated from it. Really beautiful film.

Ooft!
Off The Rails is a documentary about a group of young guys in Guildford into parkour. The film follows their story from 15 to 22, showing the ups and downs of their lives as they try to turn their passion into a career.
What this film is really about is class. It’s about the inescapability of class, and how every step forward is met with three pushes back. Yet it’s also a defiantly hopeful film, because despite these challenges (and by challenges, I mean god awful things that happen), the young men at the centre of the film continue to push, to pick themselves up, to dream of a better future for themselves, and try to create it. And regardless of success or failure, they have each other, bonds of friendship through thick and thin.
What I liked most was the way the documentary didn’t try to separate the good and the bad out. Parkour is a healthy outlet for their energy, keeps them fit, gives them a sense of athletic achievement; it’s empowering, it allows them to traverse and interact with their city in a way that gives them ownership of the place they live; it gives them an appreciation and love of architecture; it allows them to see vistas few ever would. At the same time, it’s an adrenaline hit that can become addictive, and the line between developing your skills and escalating for the rush blurs quickly; it’s spectacle, and as spectacle is subject to the pressure and demands of an audience; its transgressive nature puts it in conflict with the law, and can end up narrowing life options, rather than expanding them; it comes with genuine risk of injury and death. All of these things co-exist at the same time, and are inseparable from each other. This is not a story of how a positive thing got taken too far and became a negative thing, it’s far more complex than that.
I really identified with the guys, Rikke, Aiden, Nye, Alex and Owen. Growing up in a shithole town, no prospects, hating school. You feel like a rat scratching at a wall. While I was able to hook on to my education to get me out of there, Rikke and Aiden leave school without any qualifications. The options are shit work, no work, drink, drugs, and the noose. There seems to be no way to actually change your life. But when a clip of them doing parkour goes viral, they become YouTube stars. Suddenly the possibility of making a living doing what they love seems possible.
But all the market forces come into play. Making a YouTube channel takes an enormous amount of work, and you are entirely dependent on the algorithm and monetisation to make any income. While there are flashes of success like booking a North Face ad photoshoot, you have no hourly rate, no benefits, no sick pay. Plus, you now have the appearance of success, with millions of views, so no one can believe it when you are still unable to afford to move out your parent’s house. And the algorithm, the audience, always demand fresh content, the bigger and more extreme the better.
Rikke and Aiden are very conscientious about the impact they have on their audience, they stress that they are effectively athletes, who have practiced and practiced to be able to do what they do. Yet that can never negate that there will always be viewers willing to emulate their most dangerous stunts without the proper precautions. And they themselves are pushed, by the nature of the medium, to do the most attention-grabbing stuff. They take to train surfing, as it brings in the most views, but as one guy points out, that’s not really about parkour skill, because the train is in control. One jolt and it’s all over, doesn’t matter how good you are. And as more and more legal problems mount in the UK, it means going abroad to do their surfs, where they are less familiar with the routes, the schedules, the dangers.
This film couldn’t have asked for a better marriage of subject and theme with young working class men trying to jump over walls, an act of elation, hope and defiance, but with no promise of what is on the other side.

I didn’t like it.
The Ballad of a Great Disordered Heart is a film made by Aidan O’Rourke, Mark Cousins and Becky Manson about the area known as Little Ireland in Edinburgh’s Old Town, and its cultural and musical legacy. I admit to a bit of trepidation going in, because I’d loved Iorram with Aidan O’Rourke’s beautiful score, but I’d been less enthused by Mark Cousins’s The Story of Looking, and I couldn’t help but wonder what that combo was gonna be like in this film.
I actually was really pleased at the start of the film. Aidan reflects on the impact of the Covid lockdowns in a positive way, as a shared cultural experience, that forced us to slow down and stay put, gave us time for thought and internal recalibration, as well as connection with our neighbours and surroundings. His neighbourhood in the centre of the city was usually an anonymous place, stacks of flats one on top of another, the majority let out through Air BnB, and a constant shuffle of tourists. No one connected with their neighbours because there were no neighbours, it was as impersonal as a bustling train station. Over the course of lockdown, with the tourists gone, Aidan connected with three elderly residents, who had lived there from the time of it being Little Ireland, filled with immigrants from Ireland, Lithuania, and Italy. All called Margaret, they shared with him their memories of the neighbourhood. Great, I thought. Sounds brilliant. A sort of ethnography of neighbourhood.
But the Margarets are given barely a few minutes’ space, and then their voices are then largely absent throughout the rest of the film. Instead it focuses on Aidan and his mates in the folk music scene, talking about what folk music means to them. And the whole thing sinks into being very self-indulgent.
In fact I felt I learnt very little about the area or the Margarets, and instead was just treated to a succession of interviews by musicians about themselves. While I’d been totally up for having musical heritage being a large strand of the film, and in fact was something I was looking forward to after Aidan’s Iorram score, it became disproportionately the focus, obscuring the context it was meant to be taking place in.
Also, I absolutely hated the way a lot of this was shot. Constant close-ups of folk’s left nostril, earlobe or eyebrow hairs, while an interview was going on. Each time jittery or swaying out of focus. I understand that there was maybe an attempt to pair the soliloquising on the transcendental nature of music with a dreamy visual meditation on the curls in someone’s hair. But it just totally fought your ability to listen and focus on what was being said, or have the emotion conveyed, when you seemed to be viewing it through the short attention span of a director who seemed now to be counting the freckles on someone’s face, or pondering the beard scruff on someone’s cheek. It actively fought the content. And as time went on, it became infuriating. I ended up shutting my eyes a lot of the time so I could listen to what was being said, instead of being taken on a shuddering ghost train ride around the pores of someone’s face. I think you’ll agree that’s not ideal for a film.
So in the end, despite liking the music it contained, I’ve got to say I didn’t like The Ballad of a Great Disordered Heart. I feel it lost its grounding, lost its focus, and became far too centred on the filmmaker.